Summary
Evaluating frontier-model medical outputs against expert-developed rubrics to assess factual accuracy, reasoning, and safety.
Highlights
Evaluate frontier-model outputs in medicine against expert-developed rubrics for factual accuracy, reasoning quality, and safety.
Contribute to rubric calibration and failure-mode analysis, mostly around spotting answers that sound complete but leave out something that matters clinically.
Feed recurring error patterns back into the evaluation process to make it more consistent over time.